<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tudor House &#187; search engines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adamtudor.com/tag/search-engines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adamtudor.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:55:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google Desktop Search gets voice control &#8211; Useful?</title>
		<link>http://www.adamtudor.com/2011/06/google-desktop-search-gets-voice-control-useful/</link>
		<comments>http://www.adamtudor.com/2011/06/google-desktop-search-gets-voice-control-useful/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 20:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam T</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kinect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xbox360]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamtudor.com/?p=735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another day in search, another Google announcement, and today it&#8217;s the fact that they are bringing voice search to Google desktop search. Not a great surprise, voice search has been available on iPhones for 2-3 years at least, and on Android phones for around a year.  Microsoft have been ramping up their voice services with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another day in search, another Google announcement, and today it&#8217;s the fact that they are <a title="Voice search coming to Google desktop search" href="http://gizmodo.com/5811809/voice-search-and-search-by-image-are-coming-to-google-desktop">bringing voice search to Google desktop search</a>.</p>
<p>Not a great surprise, voice search has been available on iPhones for 2-3 years at least, and on Android phones for around a year.  Microsoft have been<a href="http://www.vg247.com/2011/06/06/microsoft-announces-kinect-voice-control-bing-youtube-and-live-tv-watching/"> ramping up their voice services</a> with the launch of Kinect, announcing more voice control services including voice driven Bing search.</p>
<p>Having been a long time Android user and a frequent Kinect gamer, I can honestly say these voice services have never added anything to either of the experiences they are offered with.</p>
<p>In 18 months of owning an Android phone I think I&#8217;ve used the voice search twice.  It doesn&#8217;t offer anything I can&#8217;t do with a keyboard, and faster if the voice recognition gets my speech wrong (usually the case).  In public it generally makes you look quite odd, and in office environments just isn&#8217;t practical.</p>
<p>For Kinect, it&#8217;s quicker and easier to use a control pad to navigate my xbox.  They&#8217;ll usually be other people present or music on, and talking isn&#8217;t a very useful or efficient way to interact with the machine.  I do things faster, more reliably, and easier with a control pad.</p>
<p>What does voice command really add to the experience? It certainly adds a &#8216;cool&#8217; factor (lasting for about 4 minutes), but after that it generally becomes a pain.  I don&#8217;t see it having a future across many servies, including this Google announcement.</p>
<p>Until voice recognition becomes perfect, I don&#8217;t see a place for it in modern life.  Until it can perfectly interpret all my natural speech, allowing me to write a blog post such as this in the time it takes to speak the words, then I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;ll be going anywhere</p>
<p>When that day comes, the way we interact with computer devices will change forever.  Productivity across workplaces will be revolutionised and the world will be quite a different place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.adamtudor.com/2011/06/google-desktop-search-gets-voice-control-useful/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bing Listing for terms without any on site content</title>
		<link>http://www.adamtudor.com/2009/06/bing-listing-for-terms-without-any-on-site-content/</link>
		<comments>http://www.adamtudor.com/2009/06/bing-listing-for-terms-without-any-on-site-content/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 20:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam T</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indexing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[serp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamtudor.com/?p=274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While checking this site&#8217;s current page rankings &#8211; (with it being a relatively new domain with little content, it hasn&#8217;t been getting great rankings except for Bing) I noticed something quite odd. My place of work ranks up in position number 4 for a bing search on my name. However, the odd thing being, that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While checking this site&#8217;s current page rankings &#8211; (with it being a relatively new domain with little content, it hasn&#8217;t been getting great rankings except for Bing) I noticed something quite odd.  My place of work ranks up in position number 4 for a bing search on my name.  However, the odd thing being, that my name cannot be found anywhere on this site whatsoever.  Not in the page content, the page tags, nothing.  It&#8217;s ranked it purely though relational page content, mentions across other sites including links, and a number of other factors.<br />
<img src="http://www.adamtudor.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/bing-logo-300x220.png" alt="bing-logo" title="bing-logo" width="300" height="220" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-283" /></p>
<p>I found it a little odd that a search engine is ranking a position 4 page for a term that doesn&#8217;t appear anywhere within the site whatsoever &#8211; a more intelligent search engine indexing process? The revolution of how search engines rank for content? A clear example of the differences between a traditional search engine and the new &#8216;decision engine&#8217; model.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bing.com/search?q=adam+tudor&#038;go=&#038;form=QBLH&#038;filt=all">Results page in question.</a></p>
<p>It also appears that I can act as a popular wood burning stove &#8211; always nice to know <img src='http://www.adamtudor.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.adamtudor.com/2009/06/bing-listing-for-terms-without-any-on-site-content/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

