Logfiles or Pagetags for Web Analytics?

In: Web Analytics

14 May 2009

When looking at web analytics, there is always the face-off, the showdown – which tracking method of the two to use should I use? Logfiles or Pagetags?

In recent years, logfiles seems to be getting less and less attention, less dedicated software solutions & less talk.  Most of big players now are all using Javatag solutions, with little to no mention of any logfiles.  Several years ago, this was a different story. With Javatags in their infancy, logfiles were a readily available method of tracking a site that anyone could work with, and there were some excellent software packages out there to analyse them.  The most widely recognised one left to my knowledge would be ClickTracks.

Outlined below is an overall comparison between the two methods of tracking.  There is no right or wrong one to choose, but their maybe a preferable method of tracking for you, based on your experience, setup, & resources.

Log Files

When you load a web page in your web browser (Internet Explorer etc.), a request for the page is made to a web server; the server then returns the page. Whenever the server does this and any other task, such as loading images or Flash content, it records the actions it takes in a log file. The log file stores data on who requested the page, what site referred them to your site, what time they made the request, what page/image/object was requested etc.

Logs can then be thoroughly processed through various pieces of software, which allow you to extract relevant information about your site, and to manipulate and filter this information.

Page Tags

Using a piece of JavaScript code in each page of your website allows tracking through software. Every time the page is requested the JavaScript automatically runs in the web browser and sends information to a log file or database stored on a remote server which can then be processed to reveal relevant information.

Page tagging also allows access to capture user data such as screen resolution, screen colour depth and the java version they are running (allowing you to see how user friendly your website is), etc.

Comparison

There is no right or wrong method, just simply two methods of measuring – different methods may suit different requirements of the user. Below is a simple comparison.


Page Tags vs Log Files Comparison

As you can see each has advantages and disadvantages, combining methods can be used, but results from these are not really comparable because of the differences in collection.

More and more vendors are providing flexible solutions to be able to filter and manipulate pagetag information in the same way that logfile analysis can be. It’s been a while coming and pagetag solutions have been playing catch-up, but they are getting closer. Coremetrics Explore, for example, allows detailed segmenting & filtering across endless data fields and reports, albeit in a slightly long winded way. Unfortunately, you are still tied into a vendor contract with no access to the physical data itself, but you do get a detailed pagetag solution with lots of extras.

When conducting any online analytics the most important aspect is to ensure all data being analysed is derived via the same method and is therefore robust and comparable.

4 Responses to Logfiles or Pagetags for Web Analytics?

Avatar

Bob Mitchell

May 14th, 2009 at 17:57

Unica NetTracker / NetInsight still allows logs to be processed without any extra hassle, (although most new clients are going for tags), there is also the option that allows the artful/creative combination of the two.

I wrote something a couple of years ago about the hybrid approach that still (mostly) holds true today http://www.bob-o-rama.com/netinsight/tags_and_logs

There’s probably more at play here than can be covered in a single post.

Avatar

Adam T

May 14th, 2009 at 19:49

Cheers for the link Bob, will have a read.

I think it’s great that NetInsight still supports both, I’m sure a system that takes in both sets of data and aggregates them out would always be much more accurate than relying on simply either one method alone.

I’ll be a sad day when there’s no more log file analytics solutions out there – sometimes when working with clients just to get hold of and go through their server logs can be relativly straightforward if they don’t already have any tracking installed.

Avatar

Bob Mitchell

May 14th, 2009 at 20:38

Also consider the likely eventual public response to the *perception* of the intrusive nature of page tags – that alone is causing some of our clients to maintain a log-based approach (downsides mitigated where possible) rather than moving to tags.

Anyway, good post.

Avatar

What to Measure Online & How - Part 2 | Tudor House

May 27th, 2009 at 11:04

[...] have it on your site, implement it now!  For more info on the page tag vs log files debate, see my previous article.  Also, since doing this, HBX to my knowledge has ceased to exist, and has since been bought up by [...]

Comment Form

In Short

Tudor House covers two of my interests; Music & Marketing, as well some personal insight.

My posts on here, as well as on Facebook & Twitter are my own and don't reflect those of my employer or anyone else!